deja vu viewing

One of the interesting things about not working in an office is the ability I have now to watch a bit of daytime TV if I wish to. It’s something of a twin-edged sword though because so little daytime stuff is any good at all. There are endless programmes about buying or selling houses successfully which are extremely annoying as you can imagine. I think most people know I can curse and swear emphatically even when I’m in a jolly good mood. But when I hear some bald-headed git or smart-ass lass with hoover bag legs telling me how easy it is to sell our home by painting everything soft peach (it already is), creating an attractive garden (got one thanks), locating in the middle of a quaint market town commutable to London (we’re here) and emphasising the house’s charm (do you mean our 200 oak beams, 400 year old cottage with aga, twisted stairs etc etc etc?) I start spitting words that would shock a back street Columbian gynaecologist with a heroin problem.

So if I need a break from the laptop, I shift channels to the whatever-else-is-on stuff and have come across this little (soft) peach of a programme on ITV1. It comes on after Loose Women which has 4 women chatting away about, well, women’s stuff (I’ve written before about my fascination with problem pages in women’s mags). None of them strike me as particularly loose to be honest although Denise Welch, who I’m strangely drawn to, has to constantly tell the world about her affairs, depressions, drug-taking, alcohol and other addictive problems, her father’s transvestism and so on. She does it so openly and honestly and amidst lots of general frivolity and chat about buying shoes, useless men, problem kids, applying mascara whilst drinking glasses of white wine etc. How do women do that? I’m in awe to be frank. But anyway, my new little gem of a prog seems to be on most days around 1pm and it’s called Have I Been Here Before? It’s tempting to silently answer ‘don’t know love, where are you?’ whenever the credits come up.

Strap yourself in. It features real minor celebs (we’re talking Conference League level guests like Eddie Large, Kerry Katona, Charles Ingram, Rebecca Loos etc) who undertake regression sessions (ooohh) with ‘experienced’ therapist Andrea Foulkes. Now according to the ITV website Andrea is a specialist in the field of inner child therapy (?), ancestral healing, aura and chakra healing. Eh? You know the sort of mumbo jumbo that the girls on LW should be asked to discuss. I can just see Denise saying with all sincerity that ‘Chakra really helped me chuck the Charlie’. I digress. Andrea puts the guests into an hypnotic sleep condition where she asks them to tell us about their earlier lives. The guests lie on a couch in this trance-like state rabbiting on about what they were doing in the 14th century or whatever.

Now I’ll come onto the guests in a second but the amazing thing is the voice of Andrea, probing deeply with this child-like monotone questioning. I can’t do it justice but please turn on, tune in and tell me what you think about THAT VOICE. It scares the sh*t out of me. I’m starting to have nightmares about it.

As for the guests well they come up with complete tripe. David Seaman, ex Arsenal goalie, imagined he was Richard I of England or some other King called Richard living in Windsor back in the middle Ages. Well you came over as a royal dick all right. I ask you. John ‘likes the chorus boys’ Barrowman was a clown – big shock there then. Hannah Waterman was a promiscuous minx having a torrid affair with her teacher. Ummm.

To validate the dream-like ramblings is Jules Hudson some poor sap of an historian and archaelogist who, must be being paid a princely sum to put his name to this rubbish. He checks whether a Richard I of England did live in the 15th century and played in goal for Ye Forest Green Grovers. Sadly, but not really surprisingly, he always suggests that perhaps the guest’s fact trail is hard to nail down from land registry records .

Back to the studio and who’s this? Only Philip Schofield having dashed hot foot from the heaving bosom of lovely Fern Britton on GMTV. Is it just me but I have to admit I had Philip down for summers at Camp David when early on in his career he had his hand up Gordon the Gopher’s opening. But he’s as rosbif as they come they say. In this prog he leaves behind the souffles and make-overs to probe the guests when they ‘return’ from Andrea’s probings back into the real world. Amidst a darkened studio full of candles and with spooky Hitchcockesque music playing lightly in the background, he shows them a recording of their ramblings and complements it with Jules’ dismissive historical findings. Ah ha, he then moves swiftly from trying to suggest that ITV had found incontrovertible proof that we have been here before, and instead switches the point of attack to the guests. So Kym Ryder, you imagined yourself as a maid bending over the kitchen table for his lordship. (I made that last bit up). What do you think this says about the real you Kym, given that jaundiced Jules cannot find one fact to substantiate your regressed story? Of course he gets them all to break down just a little and admit that whilst they do like it doggy fashion (and that bit) they all believe that they’d been here before in a previous life as the memory was so vivid. That’s Angela for you. Her auto-suggestive voice would make you believe you were a great goalie even if you’d let in some freaking howlers over the years, not least against frigging Brazil in the WC QFs, you sad pony-tailed tw*t.

So there it is. The last guest I saw was the quite lovely Kathryn Jenkins and I have to admit that my mind did begin to drift towards thoughts about Philip S having this beautiful woman hypnotised on a couch in front of him. But then there’s Angela in the corner squeaking ‘and then what happened?’ Even Gordon the Gpher’s blood would run cold.


This entry was posted in celebrities, is it just me..., tv and tagged , , by Paul. Bookmark the permalink.

About Paul

Having decided on a change of life by moving home from the UK to Italy, this is the story and thoughts of a man on a personal journey from the Blackpool Tower to the Leaning Tower of Pisa, in search of la dolce vita. After several olive harvests he's now back in London but en route he shares his very personal perspectives on life.

17 thoughts on “deja vu viewing

  1. I know Jules Hudson and can assure you he didn’t get paid lots of money he just has a sick ambition to be famous. He also is not a historian he is a bull shitter.

  2. he’s been a real bonus to the show then lizzie. i don’t think anybody comes out with any credit from this pile of day-time crap. have you heard the woman’s voice – does it scare you too?

  3. 10 out of 10 for checking in jules. you probably didn’t expect to be the one to be criticised over this programme but it is an odd way to get people interested in the subject of history; by de-bunking it in favour of celebrity ramblings. presumably you don’t get anywhere near the studio guests do you as all your work is done off-site?


    No, I didnt meet them. To be honest there was no need – our work was based solely on the transcripts of the regressions. I have no view as to whether past lives are a reality; For some they certainly are, and many see regression therapy as a prt of their everyday lives (which in itself is perhaps more telling of society today!)- and I’m not talking about celebs of whatever list!. I liken the past lives I came across more to dreams; colourful, yet often disjointed and usually very hard to follow! The show never aimed to ‘prove’ it one way or the other. Conclusions are left to the audience. But it DID go a long way towards getting ITV to consider history during that part of the schedule, and there were many viewers who enjoyed the history – albeit bite sized. I suppose in short the regressions where possible offered a small platform for social history to an audience that in many ways would never have gone near it. Despite some of the obvious shortcomings of the show I would still venture that it was an investigative experiment worth doing because as I said before, Regression is the new ‘thing’ it seems. In an ideal world greater experiment might be done to test how much of the information in regession is the product of human experience stored in the back of our minds. My guess is that most of it probably is! Yours, Jules.

  5. Hi, I quite like Jules Hudson and his appearance, for as far I have been able to see them on ETTC and viewings on the History Channel. As I live in The Netherlands I am not able to watch all the BBC’s and other UK channels. Hence if you read this Jules: complimentes! Too bad you don’t have an own website, with your background it should be quite interesting as I am also quite interested in history, (always have been), especially Anglo/Dutch relations, which are quite a few. Best regards.

  6. Pingback: Unspeakable | Pasta Paulie

Leave a Reply

Fill in your details below or click an icon to log in: Logo

You are commenting using your account. Log Out /  Change )

Twitter picture

You are commenting using your Twitter account. Log Out /  Change )

Facebook photo

You are commenting using your Facebook account. Log Out /  Change )

Connecting to %s